Evidence template

Receive-only evidence packet template

A blank, public-safe evidence packet template for practicing provenance, object identity, observation context, data integrity, boundary notes, and public-claims review without transmitting.

已評審: 2026-06-11評審到期: 2026-09-10started

預設邊界: This template is for documenting evidence after receive-only practice. It is not RF guidance, station setup, pass execution instruction, command/uplink procedure, legal advice, or mission authorization.

Sprint dashboard Gate evidence map Review kit Sprint 001 triage

Safe use

Receive-only evidence packet

Use this as a blank template for private receive-only practice records.
Attach source links and public object identity references where available.
Keep raw personal logs, local files, and private notes out of committed git unless explicitly redacted.
Use the public summary only after claims review.

Excluded everywhere

預設邊界

RF configuration
antenna settings
power levels
modulation or demodulation recipes
link-budget calculations
station setup
pass execution steps
command or uplink data
credentials or account data
private reviewer or partner correspondence

Evidence sections

Evidence template

Completion rule: A packet is complete only when each section is either filled, explicitly marked not applicable, or marked no-go with a reason.

Focus	Purpose	Minimum fields	Excluded fields	Review questions	Output artifact	Nodes
packet-metadata Packet metadata	Identify the evidence packet itself and keep the review window explicit.	Packet ID Owner or keeper Created date Last reviewed date Review expires date Public summary allowed yes/no NASA CubeSat 101: Basic Concepts and Processes for First-Time CubeSat Developers	Personal identifiers beyond what the owner intentionally records privately Credentials Private contact details	Can this packet be distinguished from later packets? Is the review expiry visible? Is the public/private status explicit?	A stable packet header.	Mission review ledger
source-provenance Source provenance	Record which public sources justify the object identity, boundary claims, and review context.	Source title Source URL Accessed date What the source supports What the source does not support NASA CubeSat 101: Basic Concepts and Processes for First-Time CubeSat Developers FCC Space Stations FAA Payload Reviews NOAA Commercial Remote Sensing Regulatory Affairs: Licensing	Private legal advice Private partner correspondence Unsupported conclusions	Does each claim map to a source or explicit uncertainty? Does the source support only the narrow statement being made? Is any source stale or outside its review window?	A source table that can be reviewed independently.	Mission review ledger Regulation
object-identity Object identity	Record what object or mission the received artifact is believed to relate to, without treating identity as proof of authority.	Public object or mission name Public catalog or identity reference if available Reference source Identity confidence Identity uncertainty note CelesTrak NORAD Documentation: Two-Line Element Sets NASA SmallSat Institute: Identification and Tracking Systems	Non-public tracking data Claims that identity proves authorization Operational targeting instructions	What evidence links the artifact to the object? What would falsify this identity assumption? Is the uncertainty visible enough for public claims?	An object identity note with uncertainty preserved.	TLE tracking LEO verified message
observation-context Observation context	Preserve the time, location granularity, and non-operational context needed to make an observation auditable.	Observation date Approximate time window General location region if safe to record Observed artifact type Weather or local context if relevant and safe NASA SmallSat Institute: Ground Data Systems and Mission Operations CelesTrak NORAD Documentation: Two-Line Element Sets	Station setup Antenna settings Frequency or modulation details Pass execution steps Precise private location unless intentionally retained privately	Can the observation be placed in time without exposing unsafe operational detail? Does the packet separate observation context from station operation? Is private location information excluded from public summaries?	A safe observation-context record.	Ground pass window Mission review ledger
received-artifact Received artifact record	Record what was received and how it is stored without publishing raw private data or operational methods.	Artifact label Artifact type Storage location in private records Redaction status Chain-of-custody note NASA CubeSat 101: Basic Concepts and Processes for First-Time CubeSat Developers	Raw artifact in public git unless explicitly redacted Decoding or operating recipe Command or uplink material Private local paths in public summaries	Can the artifact be found later by the keeper? Can public readers understand the claim without raw private data? Does the packet avoid turning evidence into an operating guide?	An artifact inventory entry.	LEO verified message Mission review ledger
data-integrity Data integrity	Preserve a reviewable integrity record for artifacts and summaries.	Artifact checksum or integrity marker if safe to record Redaction method summary Version or revision note Reviewer or keeper confirmation Known uncertainty NASA SmallSat Institute: Ground Data Systems and Mission Operations	Credentials Secret keys Private system paths in public summaries Claims that checksum proves authorization or safety	Can later reviewers tell whether the artifact changed? Are redactions described without leaking private data? Are integrity claims kept separate from legal or safety claims?	An integrity note attached to the packet.	Data integrity check Mission review ledger
authority-boundary-note Authority and boundary note	Prevent receive-only practice from being mistaken for authorization, mission readiness, or a selected regulatory path.	What this packet does support What this packet does not support Authority path status Remote-sensing applicability status Transmission status FCC Space Stations FCC Small Satellite and Small Spacecraft Licensing Process IARU Amateur Radio Satellite Frequency Coordination NOAA Commercial Remote Sensing Regulatory Affairs: Licensing	Legal advice Selected path conclusion without qualified review Authorization shortcut Operational RF data	Does the note say that receive-only evidence is not authorization? Are unresolved authority questions explicit? Would a public reader overinterpret the packet?	A boundary note beside the evidence packet.	Frequency authorization Remote sensing boundary Command uplink boundary Personal, not commercial boundary
public-claims-review Public claims review	Limit any public statement to what the packet actually supports.	Draft public claim Evidence that supports it Evidence that is missing Required caveat Decision: publish, revise, hold, or no-go NASA CubeSat 101: Basic Concepts and Processes for First-Time CubeSat Developers NASA Orbital Debris Program Office: Debris Mitigation FAA Payload Reviews	Claims of authorization without documentation Claims of safety without review Commercial readiness claims Private reviewer names or correspondence	Is every public claim weaker than the evidence? Are missing authority, integration, and disposal records visible? Should the safest outcome be no-go or hold?	A claims review table before publication.	LEO verified message Data integrity check Mission review ledger

來源

NASA CubeSat 101: Basic Concepts and Processes for First-Time CubeSat Developers NASA SmallSat Institute: Ground Data Systems and Mission Operations NASA SmallSat Institute: Identification and Tracking Systems CelesTrak NORAD Documentation: Two-Line Element Sets FCC Space Stations FCC Small Satellite and Small Spacecraft Licensing Process IARU Amateur Radio Satellite Frequency Coordination FAA Payload Reviews NOAA Commercial Remote Sensing Regulatory Affairs: Licensing NASA Orbital Debris Program Office: Debris Mitigation